67 lines
3.9 KiB
Plaintext
67 lines
3.9 KiB
Plaintext
|
~~~~~~~~
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
title: Motion Interpolation, 24 FPS to 60 FPS with mpv, VapourSynth and MVTools date: 2015-07-18
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
## modified: 2015-07-20
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Watching videos at 60 FPS is great. It makes the video significantly smoother and much more enjoyable. Sadly, lots of movies and TV shows are still at 24 FPS. However, I recently discovered that it is actually possible to interpolate the extra frames by using motion interpolation, and convert a video from 24 FPS to 60 FPS in real time. While it is far from perfect, I think the visual artifacts are a reasonable tradeoff for high framerate.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
```<!--more-->
|
|||
|
```
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Firstly, what we need is mpv with VapourSynth enabled, and MVTools plugin for VapourSynth. VapourSynth must be enabled while compiling mpv. I adopted an AUR package mpv-vapoursynth[a] which you can use if you are on Arch. Otherwise, all you need to do is use --enable-vapoursynth flag when doing ./waf --configure. They explain the compilation on their repository[b], so look into there if you are compiling yourself.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
=> https://aur4.archlinux.org/packages/mpv-vapoursynth/ [a]
|
|||
|
=> https://github.com/mpv-player/mpv [b]
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
After that, we need MVTools plugin for VapourSynth. This is available on Arch via vapoursynth-plugin-mvtools[a], otherwise you can find their repository here[b]. There is also a PPA for Ubuntu[c] where you can find vapoursynth-extra-plugins, but I haven’t used it myself so I can’t comment on it.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
=> https://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/x86_64/vapoursynth-plugin-mvtools/ [a]
|
|||
|
=> https://github.com/dubhater/vapoursynth-mvtools [b]
|
|||
|
=> https://launchpad.net/~djcj/+archive/ubuntu/vapoursynth [c]
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
After both of these are enabled, we need a script to use MVTools from VapourSynth. There is one written by Niklas Haas, which you can find here as mvtools.vpy[a]. Personally, I tweaked the block sizes and precision to my liking, as well as removing the resolution limit he added. I’ll put the modified version here:
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
=> https://github.com/haasn/gentoo-conf/blob/master/home/nand/.mpv/filters/mvtools.vpy [a]
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
```# vim: set ft=python:
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
import vapoursynth as vs
|
|||
|
core = vs.get_core()
|
|||
|
clip = video_in
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
dst_fps = display_fps
|
|||
|
# Interpolating to fps higher than 60 is too CPU-expensive, smoothmotion can handle the rest.
|
|||
|
while (dst_fps > 60):
|
|||
|
dst_fps /= 2
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
# Skip interpolation for 60 Hz content
|
|||
|
if not (container_fps > 59):
|
|||
|
src_fps_num = int(container_fps * 1e8)
|
|||
|
src_fps_den = int(1e8)
|
|||
|
dst_fps_num = int(dst_fps * 1e4)
|
|||
|
dst_fps_den = int(1e4)
|
|||
|
# Needed because clip FPS is missing
|
|||
|
clip = core.std.AssumeFPS(clip, fpsnum = src_fps_num, fpsden = src_fps_den)
|
|||
|
print("Reflowing from ",src_fps_num/src_fps_den," fps to ",dst_fps_num/dst_fps_den," fps.")
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
sup = core.mv.Super(clip, pel=1, hpad=8, vpad=8)
|
|||
|
bvec = core.mv.Analyse(sup, blksize=8, isb=True , chroma=True, search=3, searchparam=1)
|
|||
|
fvec = core.mv.Analyse(sup, blksize=8, isb=False, chroma=True, search=3, searchparam=1)
|
|||
|
clip = core.mv.BlockFPS(clip, sup, bvec, fvec, num=dst_fps_num, den=dst_fps_den, mode=3, thscd2=12)
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
clip.set_output()
|
|||
|
```
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
At this point, you should be able to try this out as suggested in the script. To set this up more permanently, I’d suggest placing this script as ~/.config/mpv/mvtools.vpy, and also writing the following as ~/.config/mpv/mpv.conf:
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
```hwdec=no
|
|||
|
vf=vapoursynth=~/.config/mpv/mvtools.vpy
|
|||
|
```
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Now, whenever you open mpv, it will always use motion interpolation.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
The result is fairly good. I noticed some significant artifacts while watching anime, but it works well with movies. I’m guessing that it is harder to track the motion in animations since they are generally exaggerated.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
One thing to keep in mind, however, is performance. With rel=2, viewing a 1080p video results in around 90% CPU usage across all cores and 1.6 GBs of ram on my Intel i7 4700MQ. With rel=1, CPU usage goes down to about 60% per core. This process is very heavy on the processor, and you may have trouble unless you have a fast CPU.
|